changeset 9985:afffb17bb75a

7048782: CMS: assert(last_chunk_index_to_check<= last_chunk_index) failed: parCardTableModRefBS.cpp:359 Summary: The LNC array is sized before the start of a scavenge, while the heap may expand during a scavenge. With CMS, the last block of an arbitrary suffice of the LNC array may expand due to coalition with the expansion delta. We now take care not to attempt access past the end of the LNC array. LNC array code will be cleaned up and suitably encapsulated as part of the forthcoming performance RFE 7043675. Reviewed-by: brutisso
author ysr
date Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:23:36 -0700
parents 5fe4dafb3739
children 6db23347d358
files hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/parNew/parCardTableModRefBS.cpp
diffstat 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/parNew/parCardTableModRefBS.cpp	Fri May 27 10:23:03 2011 -0700
+++ b/hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/parNew/parCardTableModRefBS.cpp	Thu Jun 02 10:23:36 2011 -0700
@@ -348,15 +348,31 @@
         // cleared before we had a chance to examine it. In that case, the value
         // will have been logged in the LNC for that chunk.
         // We need to examine as many chunks to the right as this object
-        // covers.
-        const uintptr_t last_chunk_index_to_check = addr_to_chunk_index(last_block + last_block_size - 1)
-                                                    - lowest_non_clean_base_chunk_index;
-        DEBUG_ONLY(const uintptr_t last_chunk_index = addr_to_chunk_index(used.last())
-                                                      - lowest_non_clean_base_chunk_index;)
-        assert(last_chunk_index_to_check <= last_chunk_index,
-               err_msg("Out of bounds: last_chunk_index_to_check " INTPTR_FORMAT
-                       " exceeds last_chunk_index " INTPTR_FORMAT,
-                       last_chunk_index_to_check, last_chunk_index));
+        // covers. However, we need to bound this checking to the largest
+        // entry in the LNC array: this is because the heap may expand
+        // after the LNC array has been created but before we reach this point,
+        // and the last block in our chunk may have been expanded to include
+        // the expansion delta (and possibly subsequently allocated from, so
+        // it wouldn't be sufficient to check whether that last block was
+        // or was not an object at this point).
+        uintptr_t last_chunk_index_to_check = addr_to_chunk_index(last_block + last_block_size - 1)
+                                              - lowest_non_clean_base_chunk_index;
+        const uintptr_t last_chunk_index    = addr_to_chunk_index(used.last())
+                                              - lowest_non_clean_base_chunk_index;
+        if (last_chunk_index_to_check > last_chunk_index) {
+          assert(last_block + last_block_size > used.end(),
+                 err_msg("Inconsistency detected: last_block [" PTR_FORMAT "," PTR_FORMAT "]"
+                         " does not exceed used.end() = " PTR_FORMAT ","
+                         " yet last_chunk_index_to_check " INTPTR_FORMAT
+                         " exceeds last_chunk_index " INTPTR_FORMAT,
+                         last_chunk_index_to_check, last_chunk_index));
+          assert(sp->used_region().end() > used.end(),
+                 err_msg("Expansion did not happen: "
+                         "[" PTR_FORMAT "," PTR_FORMAT ") -> [" PTR_FORMAT "," PTR_FORMAT ")",
+                         sp->used_region().start(), sp->used_region().end(), used.start(), used.end()));
+          NOISY(tty->print_cr(" process_chunk_boundary: heap expanded; explicitly bounding last_chunk");)
+          last_chunk_index_to_check = last_chunk_index;
+        }
         for (uintptr_t lnc_index = cur_chunk_index + 1;
              lnc_index <= last_chunk_index_to_check;
              lnc_index++) {