OpenJDK / jigsaw / jake / jdk
changeset 14609:95096672420a
8143330: Two implementation methods of AbstractStringBuilder are mistakenly declared as "protected" in JDK9b93
Reviewed-by: darcy, alanb
| author | sherman |
|---|---|
| date | Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:57:59 -0800 |
| parents | aa9e8b3916ae |
| children | ce33c780cfbd |
| files | src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/AbstractStringBuilder.java |
| diffstat | 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/AbstractStringBuilder.java Wed Nov 18 20:56:00 2015 +0100 +++ b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/AbstractStringBuilder.java Thu Nov 19 12:57:59 2015 -0800 @@ -1584,7 +1584,7 @@ * @param dstBegin the char index, not offset of byte[] * @param coder the coder of dst[] */ - protected void getBytes(byte dst[], int dstBegin, byte coder) { + void getBytes(byte dst[], int dstBegin, byte coder) { if (this.coder == coder) { System.arraycopy(value, 0, dst, dstBegin << coder, count << coder); } else { // this.coder == LATIN && coder == UTF16 @@ -1593,7 +1593,7 @@ } /* for readObject() */ - protected void initBytes(char[] value, int off, int len) { + void initBytes(char[] value, int off, int len) { if (String.COMPACT_STRINGS) { this.value = StringUTF16.compress(value, off, len); if (this.value != null) {